Objectives and Examples of CBM

Version 2

    In the video What is Condition Based Maintenance (CBM)?, John introduced a simple definition of CBM. Let's recap this definition and looks at some main objectives and specific examples of CBM in different industries below. Alternately, you can find this information on p6 -p8 of the CBM Guide ebook.

     

    2.1 An Introduction to Condition-Based Maintenance (CBM)

     

    2.1.1 Definition

     

    Condition Based Maintenance (CBM) can be defined as a set of maintenance processes driven by realtime asset information to ensure maintenance is performed only when evidence of need exists.

     

    2.1.2 Objectives

     

    The goal of a CBM implementation is to move from a calendar-based preventive maintenance program to a condition-based preventive maintenance program.

     

    The main objectives of CBM are to:

    • Reduce maintenance costs (stretch maintenance cycles)
    • Reduce adverse impacts of maintenance activities (if it works, don’t fix it)
    • Improve asset reliability (ensure assets are functional and capable)
    • Improve asset availability (minimize asset downtime)
    • Enable value realization from condition information (e.g. lifecycle extension, decision support, better capital expenditures, etc.)

     

    Objectives and Examples of CBM_1.png

     

    2.1.3 Role of CBM in CMMS

     

    Maintenance processes normally are, and in the case of this document are assumed to be, managed in a work management system as pre-described maintenance tasks (preventive or planned). Work management systems are typically called a computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) and maybe a complete and dedicated piece of software or a module of a more comprehensive enterprise asset management (EAM) or enterprise resource planning (ERP) system.

     

    Maintenance processes have been historically based on, calendar (time-based) schedules due to a lack of asset-specific condition information. Calendar-based schedules are more conservative and recommend more frequent maintenance in order to avoid running an asset to failure. Because calendar-based schedules can generate unneeded maintenance, they can increase costs as well as damage to assets during unnecessary repairs and decrease overall asset availability. When asset information is integrated into CBM-enabled work systems, maintenance processes are generated by asset-specific condition indicators that predict when an asset needs maintenance. These indicators are often supplemented by a calendar schedule as well to ensure maintenance is performed even when the asset is little used. A familiar example to the most casual reader may be the oil maintenance of a vehicle, which is typically stated in terms of a condition (7,500 miles driven) or a calendar event (12 months duration) whichever comes first.

     

    EXAMPLE: Modern vehicles can detect the condition of the lubricating oil (expressed in %) and recommend replacement when it is losing its effectiveness.

     

    EXAMPLE: A compressor needs maintenance after a certain number of start/stop cycles. If start/stop cycles cannot be counted, conservative factors would be used to estimate a time interval after which maintenance should be scheduled. The factors could be based on predictive information or vendor recommendations to ensure maintenance would be done before exceeding the recommended number of cycles. In contrast, CBM ensures maintenance is done only when there’s a need. CBM gives the advantage of setting maintenance cycles for longer periods than would have been done using conservatively based on time schedules, saving money and increasing equipment availability.

     

    Real-time asset information enables users to define asset-specific condition indicators either from raw sensor data or through data calculations. Condition indicators derived from asset data initiate maintenance tasks based on real-time conditions and are asset-specific. Real-time asset data may come from on-line monitoring (temperatures, delta pressures, start/stop sequences, etc.), off-line diagnostic tests (eddy current, corrosion inspection, oil analysis, etc.) or portable test equipment (thermography, Doble electrical test set, etc.) The PI System can manage and historize, aggregate and perform analysis on all of these data types with information from other sources. Condition indicators derived from these analyses and calculations can be provided to the CMMS. We’ll cover much more on access methods later.

     

    The benefits of well-implemented CBM programs extend outside of protecting corporate investment in asset portfolios. When real-time asset data provide visibility into asset condition, maintenance schedules and costs can be planned. (Will that compressor make it until the next outage?) Common failures or issues that occur across units or within fleets can be identified. (Why is maintenance more expensive on a specific vendor’s equipment compared to other vendors?) Just by creating visibility into asset condition indicators, data can help prevent catastrophic failures. It only takes a few big saves to typically pay for a complete CBM implementation.