AnsweredAssumed Answered

Formula Data Reference or Analysis Service?

Question asked by MPetro on May 19, 2016
Latest reply on Jun 17, 2016 by fbatista

Hi, I would really appreciate some feedback on doing calculations in AF, specifically comparing DR formula vs Analysis.

 

I have used mostly data reference formula for several reasons.

(1) It is easier to configure simple expression (eg. mass = volume *density). The formula is built in the attribute. It is also easy to understand the calculation.

(2) I copied and pasted similar attributes structure to different templates. So once I started with some calculations templates in formula, I basically relied on similar structure.

(3) As an DR attribute, I have on demand calculation. No need of PI TAG. When performance is not an issue, it was ok.

 

Then came Analysis. It offers some advantages, but copy and paste is not straight forward like in formula. The advantages I see are:

(a) it can save the result in PI TAG.

(b) Performance equation is available.

 

Question 1) With the new features in analysis (I am currently using 2015 R2), what are the best practice to do calculations in AF?

I already have some complex templates with DR formula. I would like to know if it is worth to convert them to analysis. The main advantage of formula was the on demand calculation (reason 3). Since analysis can now act like on demand calculation (save no history option), I wonder if analysis offers better performance over the formula (eg. faster on demand calculation).

 

Question 2) Can I mix formula and analysis?

I am having stability issue when I mix formula with analysis. Eg. An formula attribute is an input to an analysis. I couldn't find any recommendation on that. So I wonder if have to use analysis only.

 

Thanks, Danke, Merci, Gracias in advance

Outcomes