Normal 0 false false false EN-GB X-NONE X-NONE
I have developed a Data Reference using "Rich Data Access" (RDA) under the pre-release version of AF2012:
Just playing around really; (that is,"researching future technologies", if there are any managers reading )
It works very nicely and it is great to get rid of "COM" interop.
I get the impression it is a bit slower than PI-SDK access, at least in the CTP version. Is this as expected?
The PI_SDK has been optimised over ten+ years, so I'm not surprising that if it outperforms the first release of RDA. I remember the first release of the PI-SDK was slower than the old API.
Now, the Down-side:
To use RDA, the assembly has to be compiled under .net 4.0 - which means of course that ProcessBook, being a .net 3.5 application, cannot (normally) load it.
This leads to a series of questions:
When will we get a supported .net 4.0 ProcessBook?
How do we work around this limitation? AF 2012 has 2 versions of the Pi-point DR - one .net 3.5 and one .net 4.0 .- Processbook loads the .net 3.5 version and continues to work fine: How would you go about doing the same for a custom DR ? Does this require any "trickery" with Regplugin? What about support assemblies?
Finally, It IS, of course, possible to get the existing ProcessBook
220.127.116.119 to use .net 4.0 :
I'm surprised no-one has mentioned this - Maybe I missed it in my search.
All that is needed is to add the following to the
config section of "procbook.exe.config" :
If I do this ProcessBook loads my .net 4.0 Data-Reference and happily displays the data.
I not suggesting that anyone does this in a production environment, but it is very useful for testing.