What kind of development method can make the interface more user-friendly, less difficult to develop, and which is more suitable for C/S or B/S?
We definitely recommend PI Vision over PI Processbook. PI Vision is our de facto visualization platform and has capabilities that PI Processbook doesn't have. You can develop custom symbols in PI Vision using DHTML and also use our inbuilt symbols.
I am not sure what you mean by C/S and B/S. What do the acronyms represent?
Thank you very much for your answer.
The C/S and B/S in my question are respectively the meaning of Client/Server and Browser/Server. They are also called fat Client and thin Client.
Thanks for the info.
Fat client = PI Processbook
Thin client = PI Vision
In addition, you can also deploy your existing Processbook displays in PI Vision. Few PI Vision features will be disabled for Processbooks like edit etc.
Not authorized to view the specified discussion 2413
About PI CALC, this tool will be add in PI VISION, do you know?
If you are looking for dynamic calculations in PI Vision then would suggest you to create AF analysis with output attribute mapped ( i.e. Analysis data reference) and add to PI Vision. It will calculate dynamically based on the expression defined.
Retrieving data ...